This comprehensive survey by Transparency Market Research analyzes and forecasts the telecom service provider investment CAPEX spending at the global and regional level. The record provides analysis of the global telecom company CAPEX spending for the period from 2016 to 2026, wherein 2018 to 2026 is the forecast period and 2017 is the base 12 months. Data for 2016 is provided as historical information.

The report covers all the major developments in the telecommunication industry that play a major role in the development of CAPEX spending of telecom service providers (TSP’s) within the forecast period. In addition, it features various drivers, restraints, and opportunities expected to influence development in CAPEX spending during this time period. Bn, across different physical locations THE UNITED STATES specifically, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and SOUTH USA.

The report would help suppliers and marketers to understand the current and future tendencies in the telecommunication industry and formulate their strategies appropriately. The overview section of the report showcases the industry dynamics and trends such as the drivers, restraints, and opportunities that impact the current nature and future status of this scholarly research.

The report also supplies the ecosystem analysis for the telecommunication industry to be able to comprehend how telecom providers procure the telecom equipment and services from OEM’s and Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) companies. These capital expenses quotes have been examined by taking into consideration the impact of different political, social, economic, technological, and legal factors combined with the market dynamics impacting the CAPEX spending growth.

Capital expenses spending of telecom service providers is bifurcated on the basis of supplier type, equipment type, services, and network type. Vendor type section has been further segmented into OEM’s and Telcos/EPC’s. In terms of vendor type, telecom operators are expected to spend more on OEM’s. This is due to the increasing quantity of partnership offers between them to aid the smart city initiatives carried out by governments. Equipment covered in the study are telecom hardware, and IT or non-telecom hardware. Telecom hardware includes aggregation equipment, wireless infrastructure, IP CES and routers, optical equipment, TDM voice infrastructure, and other telecom/datacom network equipment.

IT or non-telecom hardware include batteries, control hardware, etc. Based on services, telecom service agency CAPEX spending has been bifurcated into EPC and others. Others segment is further segmented into consulting, network engineering and design, installation & maintenance, and testing & optimization. In conditions of network type, the spending is bifurcated into cellular and wired.

  • Statistics of asset allocation
  • Converting monthly claims to yearly statements using SUMIF
  • ► February 2008 (4)
  • Stop your existing SIP by providing a simple demand on a paper
  • Legal system

The report also includes competitive profiling of telecom service providers, OEM’s, and EPC’s around the world. The telecom service agency investment (CAPEX) evaluation data estimates will be the result of our in-depth supplementary research, principal interviews, and in-house expert panel reviews. In order to compile the research report, we conducted in-depth discussions and interviews with an array of key industry participants and opinion leaders. Primary research represents the majority of our research efforts, supplemented by intensive secondary research. Primary research involves telephonic interviews, e-mail interactions, and face-to-face interviews for complete and unbiased reviews about the scholarly research, across geographies.

Primary interviews are usually conducted on a continuing basis with industry experts and participants to be able to get latest insights and validate the existing data and evaluation. Main interviews offer fresh and new information on critical indicators such as industry trends, CAPEX spending, development tendencies, etc. These factors help validate and improve secondary research findings.